Request by numerous Montréalers for the maintenance of the canal along rue
Saint-Paul, 10 June 1734.
To Monseigneur hauquard
Knight, King's counsellor In His [Majesty's] Council, Intendant of justice
the police And of finance For All of Nouvelle france.
Beseeching most humbly, Jean Baptiste daguilhe,
who has power of attorney for And is Acting on Behalf of monsieur Du Bison,
Knight of the military order of St Louis And major for the king in the city
And government of Trois rivierre; Jean Baptiste Marest Lespine; jacques vigés
Cobbler; marie Baudry wife Separated in Property from pierre deroche her husband;
alexis picard; Pierre hubert And marie anne gautie widow of the late andre
dit St Andre and the men named denis And paul La Brose dit Jourdain son and
La Brose father And sieur nicolas Dulude blacksmith; jean Baptiste dahuly
dit la Rose mason And sieur Benoit Surgeon major for The king In This city,
Request [the maintenance of] the Canal constructed as per a Court ordinance
and many judgements rendered at the seat of the Jurisdiction of Montreal,
by which it was ordered that a canal be built that would Lead the Waters away
from a Certain pond since Certain people had built their homes on the said
pond, and consequently they were being flooded by the Waters of the said pond;
And in the meantime each one has Contributed to the Construction of the said
Canal since
It is true that Public calls were made by the late monsieur Des Chambaut,
the then Lieutenant general of This Jurisdiction, for the Construction of
the said Canal, And that afterwards Each of the possessors of the lots were
to Maintain it to ensure the proper Flow of the Waters from the said Pond;
the said Canal reaches a Cistern of the sisters of the Congregation of This
city And when it Is full, there is a Canal that passes Between sieurs joncquaires
And Lestage that Leads the said waters to the St Laurent river, which Is its
natural Course; And since the Said Tax for the Construction of the said canal
there has Been a lax in justice And even many judgements rendered As stated,
And this is why the said Supplicants request that the said Canal be maintained
knowing that if Another were Built to lead straight to the said river it would
Cost a Considerable amount as Land would have to be excavated approximately
fifteen to sixteen feet Deep And when the said Canal becomes Blocked another
excavation would be needed of the Said Land across rue St paul, which would
hinder the public considerably as they could not pass through to attend to
business; Moreover the Contracts of the said supplicants do not oblige them
at all to [use] the said Canal other than to transport their refuse to the
said pond, which they have not been able to do, the said la Brose father And
son having Prevented [them] saying that the more refuse is disposed of there,
the more the water Is Made to Rise in the said pond, and that they are unable
to Work in their Shops, which are
entrenched Much Below the street level, and it is true that the Waters
flow in through the windows; And meanwhile they complain that they receive
the Waters from the said supplicants who are merely Hindered by the Waters
from rue nostre dame because of the negligence of the above-mentioned, And
others who have been Condemned by the said judgements; And the said supplicants
Were pleased to find Waters flowing inside the said Canal otherwise the remainder
of the city would have Burned; That is why it is necessary to maintain the
said Canal For public usage in Conformity with the said judgement; this is
why the said supplicants submit to the said judgement rendered in the said
Jurisdiction, And having Contributed to the taxes requested by the deceased
sieur de Chambeaut who in his lifetime was lieutenant general As mentioned,
the said supplicants are appealing to you Monseigneur, so that this be granted
them.
[...]
[signed]huber
[signed]viger
[signed]marie beaudry
[signed]Daguilhe
[signed]X
[signed]X
[signed]X
Source: Archives nationales du Québec, Centre de Montréal, Greffe de notaire, CN601 S329, Porlier, Claude-Cyprien, Request by numerous Montréalers for the maintenance of the canal along rue Saint-Paul, June 10, 1734. Notes: Document from 10 June 1734, filed with Act no. 111, Convention of 22 July 1734
Return to parent page